On November 4 th, the Court will hear oral argument in a clash between religious freedom and laws and policies that protect LGBTQ rights in a case known as Fulton v. City of Philadelphia . By: Megan Coates, Staff Member, Vol. On November 4, 2020, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Fulton v. City of Philadelphia.This case has significant implications regarding diversity and inclusion: it is expected to have consequences not only for same-sex foster parenting and adoption but also for an array of forms of aid and assistance accessible to … Philadelphia informed the agencies that it would no longer refer children to them unless they agreed to comply with nondiscrimination Family Equality filed an amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) brief in this case.The brief aims to … The stigma of racial discrimination was raised at the argument before the Supreme Court in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia , which took place on November 4, 2020. Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania is a case argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on November 4, 2020, during the court's October 2020-2021 term. ... November 4, 2020: Oral argument was heard. In this case, a Catholic foster care agency resisted the City’s policy requiring agencies to certify same-sex couples as foster parents. February 24, 2020: The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear the case. Before reaching the Supreme Court, Fulton was heard at the Third Circuit, where… Those questions were important because Fulton is just one in a line of cases addressing that tension. Fulton v. City of Philadelphia is a Supreme Court case that could have profound impact on LGBTQ+ families and youth in foster care. Exercise Precedent in Fulton v. Philadelphia November 9, 2020 On November 4, 2020, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, an appeal asking the Court to revisit foundational precedent interpreting the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause. In Fulton v.City of Philadelphia, the Supreme Court will consider whether the Free Exercise Clause requires Philadelphia to contract with a private agency to provide foster-parent services even though that agency refuses to comply with the city’s neutral and generally applicable rule that prohibits discrimination against prospective foster parents in same-sex relationships. Today, the Human Rights Campaign released the following statement ahead of the Supreme Court’s oral arguments in Fulton v.City of Philadelphia, a case that considers whether taxpayer-funded foster care agencies can discriminate against LGBTQ people. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett appeared to reject the idea that the government has a compelling interest in protecting the rights of LGBTQ people during oral arguments in a high-profile discrimination and religious accommodation case on Wednesday.. Stylized as Fulton v.City of Philadelphia, the case concerns whether or not the city can … In March 2018, the city of Philadelphia learned that two of the agencies it hired to provide foster care services to children in the city’s care would not, based on their religious objection, accept same-sex couples as foster parents. During oral argument in Fulton v. City of Pennsylvania, several questions were asked about a possible compromise between religious freedom and equality rights. 19 Introduction The Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia.